Results were considered to be significant at p < 0.05 and highly significant at p < 0.001. 2.9.
← all excerpts
Refining dosing by oral gavage in the dog: a protocol to harmonise welfare.
3
—
—
The sentences
Although between-group differences over time did not reach significance, RP group had significantly lower scores overall than ShD group, with the difference being marginally non-significant with control group.
We estimate that most laboratory-housed dogs which are subject to regulated procedures will experience oral gavage, and the potential impact of oral gavage on welfare may be significant given the regularity of its use.