highly significantP = 2.15 × 10 −67
The contingency table comparing the results from the two classification algorithms yielded a highly significant level of association based on Fisher’s exact test ( P = 2.15 × 10 −67 ).
The contingency table comparing the results from the two classification algorithms yielded a highly significant level of association based on Fisher’s exact test ( P = 2.15 × 10 −67 ).
We evaluated survival curves based on CIMP status for the 12 cancer types in our study and found significant differences in KIRC, LUSC, and UCEC (BRCA results were borderline significant at 0.06) (Figure 8 B).