Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Neglect in human communication: quantifying the cost of cell-phone interruptions in face to face dialogs.

PLoS One · 2015 · PMC4454692 · PMID 26039326

2
hedged sentences
0.0000
closest p · 0.0× alpha
0.0000
boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantp < 1.18 × 10 −18actually significant
These results were confirmed by a paired t-test comparing the scores within each speaker-listener pair which showed a highly significant difference (story: t = 9.08, df = 665, p < 1.18 × 10 −18 , Cohen’s d = 0.42, partner: t = 7.91, df = 615, p < 1.18 × 10 −14 , Cohen’s d = 0.41).

also in 132,142 other papers

marginal significanceno p-value reported
The data consistently showed that none of the subjective scores were sensitive to the effect of order or duration ( S2 Table , none of the eight effects of interest reached significance or even reached marginal significance).

also in 5,069 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.