marginally significantp = .06
But the searching slope for Chinese subjects was steeper than that for Black subjects, with a marginally significant interaction of Set size and Race of participant, F (2, 82) = 2.93, p = .06, η p 2 = .07.
But the searching slope for Chinese subjects was steeper than that for Black subjects, with a marginally significant interaction of Set size and Race of participant, F (2, 82) = 2.93, p = .06, η p 2 = .07.
The main effect of Orientation reached marginal significance, F (1, 15) = 3.10, p = .099, η p 2 = .17, with a stronger negative going for upright faces than inverted faces.