As an example, results revealed substantial differences among the methods for the age 40+ compared to 18–29 RR as the set-to-failure and closest-VL are significant, borderline significance for omit-participant, and far from significant for the repeat-binary and repeat-continuous RMVL methods (p>0.50).
← all excerpts
A Comparison of Methods for Analyzing Viral Load Data in Studies of HIV Patients.
1
—
—