close to significancep = 0.052
Similarly a direct comparison of the proportion of preplay events emitted for the cued and uncued arm was close to significance (6.4% vs 4.12%, p = 0.052; see Table 4 for results for individual animals).
Similarly a direct comparison of the proportion of preplay events emitted for the cued and uncued arm was close to significance (6.4% vs 4.12%, p = 0.052; see Table 4 for results for individual animals).
However, we do see marginally significant preplay of the stem during REST1, an effect consistent with de novo preplay (area under the curve analysis of stem preplay vs shuffle in REST1: p = 0.053).