marginally significantP = 0.049
The equivalent RT analysis using correct trials revealed a main effect of “Group,” F (1,8) = 5.44, P = 0.048, and only a marginally significant “Group × Delay” interaction, F (4,32) = 5.40, P = 0.049.
The equivalent RT analysis using correct trials revealed a main effect of “Group,” F (1,8) = 5.44, P = 0.048, and only a marginally significant “Group × Delay” interaction, F (4,32) = 5.40, P = 0.049.
1, an ANOVA on the log-transformed RT data for responding to the probe revealed a main effect of “Group” with a trend toward significance, F (1,8) = 4.75, P = 0.061, but without a “Group × Delay” interaction, F (4,32) = 1.80, P = 0.154 (see Fig. 2 D).