Audiovisual crossmodal cuing effects in front and rear space.

Front Psychol · 2015 · PMC4519676 · PMID 26284010

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0570

closest p · 1.1× alpha

0.0890

boldest claim

The sentences

marginally significantp = 0.057so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

The two-way interaction between Spatial Cuing and SOA was marginally significant, F (2,48) = 3.043, p = 0.057.

also in 26,082 other papers

borderline significantp = 0.058so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

A borderline significant two-way interaction was found between Target Type and Target Depth, F (1,23) = 3.978, p = 0.058, with participants responding more rapidly to the pure tone targets ( M = 535 ms) than to the white noise targets ( M = 549 ms) in the front, but more slowly to pure tone targets ( M = 551 ms) than to white noise targets ( M = 513 ms) in the rear space.

also in 11,409 other papers

failed to reach significancep = 0.089so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

However, the trend toward a cuing effect at the 700 ms SOA failed to reach significance, t (24) = -1.771, p = 0.089 (see Figure 4 and Table 2 ).

also in 4,113 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.