marginally significantp = .054
None of the simple effects of non-esteem identification were significant (all p s > .13), but when we decomposed this interaction by salience condition, the two-way interaction between education and non-esteem identification was marginally significant when education was salient ( B = −.42, SE = .217, p = .054, 95% CI [−0.846, 0.007]) but not when it was not salient ( B = .36, SE = .243, p = .14, 95% CI [−0.115, 0.841]).