Effect of ethnicity on glycaemic index: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Nutr Diabetes · 2015 · PMC4521176 · PMID 26168085

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0001

closest p · 0.0× alpha

0.0600

boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantP <0.0001actually significant

However, there is no evidence from these studies that ethnicity would disrupt the utility of GI for ranking the glycemic impact of foods; the correlation between the GI in non-Caucasians and the GI in Caucasians was highly significant ( r =0.820, n =28, P <0.0001).

also in 132,142 other papers

borderline significantP =0.06so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

Overall, there was borderline significant evidence of higher GI in non-Caucasians than Caucasians (MD, 3.3 (95% CI, −0.1, 6.8); P =0.06) with significant heterogeneity ( I 2 , 46% P =0.005).

also in 11,409 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.