Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Strong Selective Sweeps on the X Chromosome in the Human-Chimpanzee Ancestor Explain Its Low Divergence.

PLoS Genet · 2015 · PMC4537231 · PMID 26274919

2
hedged sentences
0.0000
closest p · 0.0× alpha
0.0672
boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantp-value < 2.2e-16actually significant
0.00276, Fisher's exact test p-value = 1.34e-05), there is a highly significant excess of sites supporting the species topology (0.00229 vs. 0.00210, Fisher's exact test p-value < 2.2e-16) and deficit of sites in these regions supporting ILS topologies (0.00042 vs. 0.00066, Fisher's exact test p-value < 2.2e-16, Fig 2B and 2C ), which suggests that the observed reduction of ILS is not the result of a lower mutation rate.

also in 132,142 other papers

marginally significantp-value = 0.06721so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
We find a striking correspondence between regions of low ILS and the regions devoid of Neanderthal introgression for European populations (p-value = 0.00021, permutation test) and a marginally significant association with the more introgressed Asian populations (p-value = 0.06721, Fig 5 ).

also in 26,082 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.