Effect of Pulse Rate and Polarity on the Sensitivity of Auditory Brainstem and Cochlear Implant Users to Electrical Stimulation.

J Assoc Res Otolaryngol · 2015 · PMC4569604 · PMID 26138501

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0010

closest p · 0.0× alpha

0.0510

boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantP < 0.001actually significant

marginally significantP = 0.054so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

The main effect of pulse rate was highly significant ( F (2,20) = 99.3, P < 0.001) and that of duration was marginally significant ( F (1,10) = 4.76, P = 0.054).

also in 132,142 other papers

borderline significantP = 0.051so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

A combined (group × rate × polarity) ANOVA revealed a borderline significant interaction between group and polarity ( F (1,6) = 5.91; P = 0.051), providing some evidence that the threshold difference between fixed and alternating polarity was larger for ABI users than for CI users.

also in 11,409 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.