marginally significantp = .076
Consistent with hypothesis 1, the predicted interaction between Republican identification and the Anger contrast was marginally significant, b = –.06, t (291) = –1.78, p = .076, partial η 2 = .01 (see Fig 5 ).
Consistent with hypothesis 1, the predicted interaction between Republican identification and the Anger contrast was marginally significant, b = –.06, t (291) = –1.78, p = .076, partial η 2 = .01 (see Fig 5 ).