We also found a highly significant increase in spatial coherence in response to the object (no object: 0.30 ± 0.03 vs. object: 0.59 ± 0.04, t (20) = 6.63, mean ± SEM, two-tailed t test for paired two samples for means, p < 0.0001) while spatial information content (Skaggs) was unaltered (no object: 1.96 ± 0.19 vs. object: 1.78 ± 0.13, t (20) = 3.54, mean ± SEM, two-tailed t test for paired two samples for means).
← all excerpts
Dynamics of place, boundary and object encoding in rat anterior claustrum.
1
—
—