Exploring end of life priorities in Saudi males: usefulness of Q-methodology.

BMC Palliat Care · 2015 · PMC4661936 · PMID 26611147

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentence

0.0570

closest p · 1.1× alpha

0.0570

boldest claim

The sentences

borderline significantp = 0.057so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

There was no significant difference in sorting time (ANOVA p = 0.42) and borderline significant difference in age (ANOVA, p = 0.057), which was due to a significant difference between opinion types I and IV ( p = 0.04).

also in 11,409 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.