highly significantP > 0.001
The effect of trap model was highly significant (χ 2 = 50.6, df = 3, P > 0.001), whereas population of origin (χ 2 = 4.02, df = 3, P = 0.26), sex (z = −1.616, P = 0.106) and aquaria identity (z = 0.34, p = 0.73) were not.
The effect of trap model was highly significant (χ 2 = 50.6, df = 3, P > 0.001), whereas population of origin (χ 2 = 4.02, df = 3, P = 0.26), sex (z = −1.616, P = 0.106) and aquaria identity (z = 0.34, p = 0.73) were not.