marginally significantp = 0.07
Transition from avoidance conditioning to response prevention Figure 2B suggests a strong return of differential danger-safety ratings upon removal of the avoidance button, which was confirmed by a 2 (Group) × 2 (CS) × 2 (Trial: last avoidance trial, first extinction trial) RM-ANOVA that revealed a CS × Trial interaction, F (1, 16) = 79.34, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.83, which was unexpectedly qualified by a marginally significant Group × CS × Trial interaction, F (1, 16) = 3.82, p = 0.07, η 2 = 0.19.