marginally significantp =0.11
The only consistent effect observed on error rate was a marginally significant increase associated with more PCR cycles ( p =0.11 - see Fig. 5 a ).
The only consistent effect observed on error rate was a marginally significant increase associated with more PCR cycles ( p =0.11 - see Fig. 5 a ).
Using 1 ng of template reduced the proportion of chimeric reads compared to 10 ng but only with marginal significance ( p =0.22) (see Fig. 5 b ).
In both cases there is a highly significant correlation between the two ratios and a slope that is nearly one for a regression forced through the origin.