Effects of Presentation Type and Visual Control in Numerosity Discrimination: Implications for Number Processing?

Front Psychol · 2016 · PMC4734174 · PMID 26869967

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0010

closest p · 0.0× alpha

0.0550

boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantp < 0.001actually significant

This test was highly significant, p < 0.001, and indicated that the two correlations between Weber fractions of the two visual cue control conditions within each presentation format were significantly different from one and other: Weber fractions between the two visual cue controls in the sequential conditions were correlated, while Weber fractions between the two visual cue controls in the simultaneous conditions were not related.

also in 132,142 other papers

marginally significantp = 0.055so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

These factors were included in a marginally significant interaction, F (1, 39) = 3.83, p = 0.055, η p 2 = 0.09.

also in 26,082 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.