marginally significantp = 0.08
The interaction between these two factors was marginally significant, F (1,26) = 3.26, p = 0.08; Simple main effect analysis showed that, while the percentage of double-‘yes’ responses decreased significantly from non-contradictory trials to contradictory trials for both judgment target ( p s < 0.01), the reduction was greater for the self-judgment, indicating that participants were more reluctant to attribute conflicting adjectives to self than other target.