Bimanual Coordination Learning with Different Augmented Feedback Modalities and Information Types.

A mixed-design Group × interference type (VR-C, VR-D, or AR-D) ANOVA on counting accuracy showed that participants’ performance in the counting task was not significantly different among groups, F (2,19) = 1.74, MSE = .01, p = .203, η 2 = .001, or the interference types, F (2,38) = 1.20, MSE = .01, p = .313, η 2 = .05, while the Group × interference type interaction was marginally significant, F (4,38) = 2.68, MSE = .01, p = .046, η 2 = .21.

also in 26,082 other papers

Retention status failed to reach significance, F (1,19) = .06, MSE = 15.28, p = .810, η 2 = .003, demonstrating a fairly stable performance for all participants under different feedback conditions.

also in 4,113 other papers