4 , upper panels), SAL-treated stressed animals showed a marked decrease, relative to SAL-treated controls, in exploration of the novel object, which was highly significant in both tests [t(1,30) = 3.85 and 4.47, p < 0.001].
However, visual inspection suggests that the effect of RIV to reverse the effect of stress was present in the first test but not the second, and a further post hoc test confirmed that the difference between CON and STR RIV-treated animals was marginally significant in test 2 [t(1,14) = 2.30, p < 0.05].