Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Systematic review and meta-analysis of glyphosate exposure and risk of lymphohematopoietic cancers.

J Environ Sci Health B · 2016 · PMC4866614 · PMID 27015139

4
hedged sentences
closest p
boldest claim

The sentences

marginally significantno p-value reported
Conclusion In conclusion, we found marginally significant positive meta-RRs for the association between glyphosate use and risk of NHL and MM, and statistically null associations with HL and leukemia.

also in 26,082 other papers

borderline significantno p-value reported
Discussion Our meta-analysis yielded borderline significant RRs of 1.3 and 1.4 between glyphosate use and risk of NHL and MM, respectively, and no significant association with risk of HL or leukemia.

also in 11,409 other papers

Meta-relative risks (meta-RRs) were positive and marginally statistically significant for the association between any versus no use of glyphosate and risk of NHL (meta-RR = 1.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.0–1.6, based on six studies) and MM (meta-RR = 1.4, 95% CI = 1.0–1.9; four studies).

also in 1,110 other papers

a positive trendno p-value reported
The case-control study found mixed evidence of a positive trend (statistical significance not reported), while a positive trend was detected in one analysis of the cohort data [12] but not the other.

also in 11,005 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.