very close to significanceP = 0.051
However, in the EGL we were unable to find a suitable model for reln +∕+ mice, although linear regression yielded statistic data very close to significance (adjusted R 2 = 0.91; P = 0.051).
However, in the EGL we were unable to find a suitable model for reln +∕+ mice, although linear regression yielded statistic data very close to significance (adjusted R 2 = 0.91; P = 0.051).
In the EGL, we were unable to find a suitable model for reln +∕+ mice, although linear regression yielded data very close to statistical significance (adjusted R 2 = 0.91; P = 0.051; Df = 1; F = 18.46307681).