marginal significancep = 0.056
However, a marginal significance for glycaemic response was noted between UKMRC9 and Jasmine ( p = 0.056) ( Figure 1 a), which was also reflected by their IAUC glu ( p = 0.06) ( Figure 1 a i ).
However, a marginal significance for glycaemic response was noted between UKMRC9 and Jasmine ( p = 0.056) ( Figure 1 a), which was also reflected by their IAUC glu ( p = 0.06) ( Figure 1 a i ).
Post hoc comparison indicated UKMRC9 elicited a marginally significant lower insulin generation compared to UKMRC11 ( p = 0.083) and Jasmine ( p = 0.052) ( Figure 1 b).