marginally significantP = 0.05
A marginally significant OS difference was also noticed in high-quality than in low-quality TE inserted group in the subgroup analysis (100.0% vs. 71.4%, P = 0.05).
A marginally significant OS difference was also noticed in high-quality than in low-quality TE inserted group in the subgroup analysis (100.0% vs. 71.4%, P = 0.05).
TE insertion showed marginal significance on LRFS ( P = 0.06).