failed to reach significancep = 0.153
Participants (7 of 11) also handcycled 1.8 (3.0)% faster during CAF compared to PLA (1450 (86) and 1476 (67) s, respectively) ( Figure 2 ); however, this failed to reach significance (ES = −0.34, p = 0.153).
Participants (7 of 11) also handcycled 1.8 (3.0)% faster during CAF compared to PLA (1450 (86) and 1476 (67) s, respectively) ( Figure 2 ); however, this failed to reach significance (ES = −0.34, p = 0.153).