marginally significantp = 0.053
The first model was marginally significant [ F (1,632) = 12.15, Δ R 2 = 0.006, p = 0.053] and the second was statistically significant [Δ F (1,631) = 5.51, Δ R 2 = 0.009, p = 0.019].
The first model was marginally significant [ F (1,632) = 12.15, Δ R 2 = 0.006, p = 0.053] and the second was statistically significant [Δ F (1,631) = 5.51, Δ R 2 = 0.009, p = 0.019].