trending toward significancep = 0.09
In the full sample of n = 126, this correlation was trending toward significance (r = −0.15, p = 0.09).
In the full sample of n = 126, this correlation was trending toward significance (r = −0.15, p = 0.09).
Accuracy dropped slightly when identification was performed between rest and task, or between two task conditions, but remained highly significant (80–90% for most condition pairs).