Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Cachexia in cancer: what is in the definition?

BMJ Open Gastroenterol · 2016 · PMC5093365 · PMID 27843571

1
hedged sentence
closest p
boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantp<00a dropped decimal point
Following correction for primary tumour location, metastatic status, age and gender, the difference between patient groups with and without cachexia diagnosis according to Fearon et al becomes more significant (p=00 055 instead of p=00 338) and the difference according to Evans et al remains highly significant (p<00 001; figure 2 A, B).

also in 132,142 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.