highly significantp=3x10 −5
There were highly significant differences between the mean PRS in affected women at baseline compared to unaffected women in each cohort as well as the combined set (p=3x10 −5 , 1x10 −6 , and1x10 −10 , respectively).
There were highly significant differences between the mean PRS in affected women at baseline compared to unaffected women in each cohort as well as the combined set (p=3x10 −5 , 1x10 −6 , and1x10 −10 , respectively).
The HRs for the continuous PRS were not significantly different between the BCFR and kConFab study cohorts (p=0.13) for study*PRS interaction, but were borderline significant for the upper vs. lower quintile (P=0.05), nor did the HR vary significantly as a function of age at baseline (p=0.88 and p=0.71 for the two cohorts, respectively).