marginally significantp = 0.06
The effect of rhythm modality was marginally significant, F (1, 19) = 3.93, p = 0.06, η p 2 = 0.17 (Bayes factor 2.3: 1 in favor of the effect), with a trend of somewhat greater d’ for A than for AV.
The effect of rhythm modality was marginally significant, F (1, 19) = 3.93, p = 0.06, η p 2 = 0.17 (Bayes factor 2.3: 1 in favor of the effect), with a trend of somewhat greater d’ for A than for AV.