Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Beauty is in the belief of the beholder: cognitive influences on the neural response to facial attractiveness.

Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci · 2016 · PMC5141965 · PMID 27522090

2
hedged sentences
0.0010
closest p · 0.0× alpha
0.0800
boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantP < 0.001actually significant
In general, the non-parametric correlations (Spearman’s rho) for attractiveness ratings between the first and second presentation for each trial type were all highly significant (all P < 0.001). 5 Changes in LPP amplitudes and self-reported attractiveness from first to second presentation are shown in Figure 4 .

also in 132,142 other papers

marginally significantP = 0.08so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
That ANOVA produced a main effect of trial type [ F (2,38) = 328.49, P < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.95], a marginally significant effect of repetition level [ F (1,19) = 3.33, P = 0.08, η p 2 = 0.15] and a marginally significant interaction between trial type and repetition level [ F (2,38) = 2.42, P = 0.10, η p 2 = 0.11].

also in 26,082 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.