(Table II), in which the clinical and pathological characters of the disease were different from those of true enterica (Table I). The following passage from the Annual Report of the Sanitary Commissioner, Govern- ment of India, for the year 1891, in connection with this subject is, I think, highly significant and worthy of a careful study 10 :? " Meanwhile it should be borne in mind that the finding of the enteric bacillus in a few cases of Indian fever although it proves that the same enteric fever occurs in India as in Europe, does not prove that all Indian continued or remittent fevers are of the same kind.
1
—
—