Time to Move Again: Does the Bereitschaftspotential Covary with Demands on Internal Timing?

Front Hum Neurosci · 2016 · PMC5174124 · PMID 28066213

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0600

closest p · 1.2× alpha

0.0600

boldest claim

The sentences

failed to reach significancep = 0.06so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

With regard to the effect at −1500 ms (mean amplitudes −1600 ms to −1400 ms) the interaction of Clock × Subgroup in ANOVA failed to reach significance ( F (1,14) = 4.3, p = 0.06; Nor was a significant interaction obtained when onset times were analyzed).

also in 4,113 other papers

highly significantno p-value reported

Also in line with hypothesis (1), BP amplitudes became larger when required minimum intervals were longer, with a highly significant linear contrast.

also in 132,142 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.