borderline significantp = 0.09
As depicted in Table 2 , the GLMM analysis revealed borderline significant differential effects of the interventions on continued abstinence by SES ( p = 0.09) and by intention to quit ( p = 0.08) (first model).
As depicted in Table 2 , the GLMM analysis revealed borderline significant differential effects of the interventions on continued abstinence by SES ( p = 0.09) and by intention to quit ( p = 0.08) (first model).