Optimized Left Ventricular Endocardial Stimulation Is Superior to Optimized Epicardial Stimulation in Ischemic Patients With Poor Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: A Combined Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Electroanatomic Contact Mapping, and Hemodynamic Study to Target Endocardial Lead Placement.

JACC Clin Electrophysiol · 2016 · PMC5196018 · PMID 28066827

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0014

closest p · 0.0× alpha

0.0700

boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantp = 0.0014actually significant

The difference between the best versus worst LVepi site was highly significant (p = 0.0014) as it was for best versus worst LVendo (p = 0.0002).

also in 132,142 other papers

a nonsignificant trendp = 0.07so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

There was a nonsignificant trend toward an improved AHR with basal compared with mid and apical positions at all sites (LVepi and LVendo) (base 13.7 ± 11, mid 8.1 ± 9.8, apex 9.6 ± 12.7; p = 0.07).

also in 5,406 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.