Seroprevalence of feline immunodeficiency virus and feline leukaemia virus in Australia: risk factors for infection and geographical influences (2011-2013).

JFMS Open Rep · 2016 · PMC5362860 · PMID 28491420

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0600

closest p · 1.2× alpha

0.0600

boldest claim

The sentences

only just failed to reach significanceP = 0.06so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

Risk factors for FeLV seropositivity Age, sex and neutering status were not found to be risk factors for FeLV infection ( P = 0.87, P = 0.50 and P = 0.63, respectively), and sampling location only just failed to reach significance ( P = 0.06).

also in 4 other papers

a trend towards significanceP = 0.06so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

The seroprevalence of FIV infection was not significantly different between ‘healthy’ and ‘sick’ cats using the aforementioned definitions (14% vs 16%; P = 0.17), although when cats classified with dental disease were excluded from analysis there was a trend towards significance ( P = 0.06).

also in 2,760 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.