marginally significantp = .08
Amount of L1 use had a marginally significant main effect F (1, 39) = 3.26, p = .08, R 2 = .08.
Amount of L1 use had a marginally significant main effect F (1, 39) = 3.26, p = .08, R 2 = .08.
For example, F2-F1 values (overall vowel position in the oral cavity) indicated that EMs produce schwa at points of articulation that differ from either EBs ( p <.001) or LBs ( p = .019), whereas the difference between EBs and LBs failed to reach significance, p = .544.