A First Step toward the Understanding of Implicit Learning of Hazard Anticipation in Inexperienced Road Users Through a Moped-Riding Simulator.

Front Psychol · 2017 · PMC5425582 · PMID 28553254

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0600

closest p · 1.2× alpha

0.0800

boldest claim

The sentences

failed to reach significancep = 0.06so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

The Gender factor failed to reach significance ( p = 0.06).

also in 4,113 other papers

marginally significantp = 0.08so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

The Gender main effect was not significant ( p = 0.73), whereas the Session main effect was marginally significant, F (1,14) = 3.57, p = 0.08, MSe = 405.33: the SCR percentages tended to decrease in the second session (Ms = 58% vs. 52%).

also in 26,082 other papers

marginal significanceno p-value reported

This might be the reason for the marginal significance of the Session factor in the analysis of SCR percentage, as the greater ability of participants to drive so that hazards did not occur (which should have led to lower percentages of SCRs) might have masked their augmented sensitivity (which should have led to higher percentages of SCRs).

also in 5,069 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.