Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Validation of Nomograms for Survival and Metastases after Hysterectomy and Adjuvant Therapy in Uterine Cervical Cancer with Risk Factors.

Biomed Res Int · 2017 · PMC5425848 · PMID 28536694

2
hedged sentences
0.0520
closest p · 1.0× alpha
0.0520
boldest claim

The sentences

marginal significanceP = 0.052so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
In another surgical study, the increase of age decreased the DFS, with a hazard ratio of 0.935 with marginal significance ( P = 0.052) [ 17 ], and, in a Japanese study using CCRT in huge FIGO IB–IIB cervical cancers, age less than 48 was an independent poor prognosis factor [ 18 ].

also in 5,069 other papers

borderline significantno p-value reported
Multiple lymph node metastases ( P = 0.006, 0 versus ≥3) were significantly associated with DFS, and large tumor size ( P = 0.058), young age ( P = 0.074, ≤40 versus 41–64), and high serum SCC ( P = 0.093) were borderline significant ( Table 2 ).

also in 11,409 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.