Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Individual differences in the early recognition of moral information in lexical processing: An event-related potential study.

Sci Rep · 2017 · PMC5431227 · PMID 28469271

2
hedged sentences
0.0560
closest p · 1.1× alpha
0.0560
boldest claim

The sentences

marginally significantp = 0.056so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
A two-way repeated measures ANOVA with the stimulus types and electrodes as within-subject variables conducted on the mean amplitudes of the RP revealed a significant main effect of the stimulus types( F (2, 52) = 4.503, p = 0.023, η p 2 = 0.148) and a marginally significant main effect of the electrodes and interaction effect between the stimulus types and electrodes ( F (3, 78) = 3.284, p = 0.056, \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usep

also in 26,082 other papers

failed to reach significanceno p-value reported
However, the correlation failed to reach significance when the conservative Bonferroni correction method was applied.

also in 4,113 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.