Catecholaminergic challenge uncovers distinct Pavlovian and instrumental mechanisms of motivated (in)action.

The effect of cue valence was highly significant for both Go and NoGo cues (Go cues: X 2 (1)=37.5, p<0.001; NoGo cues: X 2 (1)=13.3, p<0.001), though marginally stronger for the Go cues (Required Action x Valence: X 2 (1)=3.1; p=0.076).

also in 132,142 other papers