marginally significantp = 0.05
There was a marginally significant interaction between cued area size and cue style on accuracy, F (2,56) = 3.06, p = 0.05, but not response time, F (2,56) = 0.50, p = 0.61.
1
0.0500
0.0500
There was a marginally significant interaction between cued area size and cue style on accuracy, F (2,56) = 3.06, p = 0.05, but not response time, F (2,56) = 0.50, p = 0.61.