Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Conflict over non-partitioned resources may explain between-species differences in declines: the anthropogenic competition hypothesis.

Behav Ecol Sociobiol · 2017 · PMC5486810 · PMID 28706341

2
hedged sentences
0.0010
closest p · 0.0× alpha
0.0880
boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantP < 0.001actually significant
Separate analyses showed that this occurred because the interaction was highly significant for cavity-nesting species ( t 34 = −3.659, P < 0.001), significant for ground-nesting species ( t 22 = −2.376, P = 0.016) and non-significant for branch nesting species ( t 75 = −0.838, P = 0.253).

also in 132,142 other papers

almost significantP = 0.088so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
Separate analyses showed that this occurred because the interaction was almost significant for cavity-nesting species ( t 19.3 = −1.933, P = 0.088), significant for branch nesting species ( t 23.7 = −2.632, P = 0.009) and non-significant for ground-nesting species ( t 14.3 = 0.519, P = 0.421).

also in 1,858 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.