Interviewing Suspects in Denial: On How Different Evidence Disclosure Modes Affect the Elicitation of New Critical Information.

Front Psychol · 2017 · PMC5511857 · PMID 28769829

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentence

0.0600

closest p · 1.2× alpha

0.0600

boldest claim

The sentences

marginally significantp = 0.060so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

There was a marginally significant main effect of Interview condition, F (1, 86) = 3.64, p = 0.060, η p 2 = 0.04, indicating that the suspects in the SUE combined ( M = 1.91, SD = 0.29) overestimated the interviewer's knowledge about the critical phase to a higher extent, compared to the suspects in the Early disclosure condition ( M = 0.96, SD = 0.41).

also in 26,082 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.