Language related differences of the sustained response evoked by natural speech sounds.

However, in line with the results of Experiment 1, we observed a highly significant group difference for signals evoked by the syllable <ma1> in the post-hoc tests (RMS: post-hoc test /ma1/: F (1,25) = 5.35, P = 0.0292, η 2 = 0.15 t (25) = 2.31, P = 0.029; dipole analysis: group : F (1,25) = 4.86, P = 0.0369, η 2 = 0.16; hemisphere : F (1,25) = 5.30, P = 0.030, η 2 = 0.17; group*hemisphere : F (1,25) = 1.67, n.s.).

also in 132,142 other papers

Both approaches were not significant for vowel effects /o/ vs /ö/ (RMS: F (1,38), n.s.; dipole-solution: vowel : F (1,38) = 1.52, n.s.), however a significant interaction was found for the RMS data group*vowel (F(1,38) = 4.17, p = 0.0481) that failed to reach significance for the dipole solution ( F (1,38) = 0.12, n.s.).

also in 4,113 other papers