marginally significantP = 0.05
When the analysis was limited to just 2013, this difference remained marginally significant ( F (2,6) = 4.96, P = 0.05) and Ae. albopictus showed a tendency to be more abundant in agricultural sites.
When the analysis was limited to just 2013, this difference remained marginally significant ( F (2,6) = 4.96, P = 0.05) and Ae. albopictus showed a tendency to be more abundant in agricultural sites.