Compared with TAU, subsequent Cox regression analysis showed that the probability for remission was significantly higher for ALGO DE (HR=1.67 [95%CI 1.11–2.52] Wald test=6.03, P =.014) and for ALGO SW (HR=1.64 [95%CI 1.10–2.48] Wald test=5.60, P =.018), but narrowly missed statistical significance for ALGO LA (HR=1.49 [95%CI 0.99–2.25] Wald test=3.69, P =.055), while there was no difference for time to remission between CDES and TAU (HR=1.06 [95% CI 0.68–1.63], Wald test=0.06, P =.811) (HR=1.06 [95% CI 0.68–1.63], Wald test=0.06, P =.811).
← all excerpts
How Effective Is Algorithm-Guided Treatment for Depressed Inpatients? Results from the Randomized Controlled Multicenter German Algorithm Project 3 Trial.
2
0.0550
0.0550
The sentences
Our results show a shorter time to remission for ALGO DE and ALGO SW but only a nonsignificant trend for ALGO LA compared with CDES and TAU.