Don't let it distract you: how information about the availability of reward affects attentional selection.

Atten Percept Psychophys · 2017 · PMC5662709 · PMID 28733838

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0580

closest p · 1.2× alpha

0.0730

boldest claim

The sentences

marginally significantp = 0.058so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

There was no main effect of reward, F (1,17) = 0.959, p = 0.341, but session was marginally significant, F (1,17) = 4.136, p = 0.058, η 2 = 0.196.

also in 26,082 other papers

marginal significancep = 0.073so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

A subsequent analysis showed that participants also tended to miss out more often on reward payout in the high than in the low reward condition, although the difference in number of trials quicker than the RT limit did only reach marginal significance, t (17) = 1.908, p = 0.073, 95% CI [−0.89, 17.66].

also in 5,069 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.